IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v123y2026ics2214804326000996.html

Two nudges, one goal: Promoting animal welfare in a virtual supermarket

Author

Listed:
  • Bach, Leonie
  • Hartmann, Monika
  • Weingarten, Nina

Abstract

Despite widespread concern for animal welfare, a gap persists between consumers' attitudes and their purchasing behaviour. To address this discrepancy, our study examined various nudging strategies within a simulated, two-dimensional virtual supermarket in Germany. Using a 2 × 2 between-subjects design, we assessed the effectiveness of a social norm nudge, an information nudge and a combination of both, while also exploring the mediating role of descriptive normative beliefs. Our results reveal significant main effects for both nudges, but no interaction effect. This suggests that each nudge independently increased the rate of purchasing products with higher animal welfare standards. Although the combined nudge condition resulted in the largest overall impact, the effects were additive rather than super-additive. Additionally, while participants generally held high levels of descriptive normative beliefs, the social norm nudge did not further elevate these beliefs. Nonetheless, participants with higher descriptive normative beliefs tended to purchase more products with higher animal welfare standards. The study findings emphasise the need for a nuanced understanding of how combined nudging strategies impact purchasing behaviour in supermarkets.

Suggested Citation

  • Bach, Leonie & Hartmann, Monika & Weingarten, Nina, 2026. "Two nudges, one goal: Promoting animal welfare in a virtual supermarket," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000996
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000996
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102608?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.