IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v123y2026ics221480432600090x.html

Content matters - sending emails to ensure appropriate use of laboratory fees

Author

Listed:
  • Godager, Geir
  • Kaarboe, Oddvar
  • Moger, Tron Anders
  • Aars, Ole Kristian

Abstract

This study examines communication interventions' impact on general practitioners' (GPs) claiming of fees for laboratory tests. GPs, who recently claimed laboratory fees, were randomly assigned to two intervention groups (Mild and Strong) or a control group. Initially, both intervention groups received an email emphasizing the importance of utilizing lab tests judiciously, the range of conditions tested, and the need for patients to bear the costs of unnecessary tests. In a subsequent phase, a reminder email was sent with different content. The Mild group received a reiteration of the initial email, while the Strong group was reminded of the economic consequences and potential impact on access to other healthcare services, as stated in the ethical guidelines of the Norwegian Medical Association. Results show that the first email had no effect on either intervention group. However, the reminder email significantly influenced the Strong group, leading to a reduction in tests and conditions. Importantly, this effect differed statistically from the impact observed in the Mild group in terms of test utilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Godager, Geir & Kaarboe, Oddvar & Moger, Tron Anders & Aars, Ole Kristian, 2026. "Content matters - sending emails to ensure appropriate use of laboratory fees," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s221480432600090x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432600090X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102599?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s221480432600090x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.