IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v123y2026ics2214804326000868.html

Public transport vouchers to enhance ridership: Mental accounting bias in frequent public transport users

Author

Listed:
  • Cardona, Santiago Gómez
  • Guzman, Luis A.
  • Rincón, Jorge Luis Ochoa

Abstract

The widespread adoption of smart travel cards has substantially enhanced the flexibility of pricing mechanisms in public transport. This study examines the impact of a monthly voucher on increasing the utilization of public transport services. The analysis is based on a controlled field experiment conducted within Bogotá’s public transport system. We provide empirical evidence of the presence of Mental Accounting Bias (MAB) in the context of transport voucher use. Specifically, we demonstrate that the increased ridership observed among voucher recipients can be attributed not only to the voucher’s monetary value but also to a behavioral response triggered by a perceived expansion of their transport budget. This finding highlights the role of MAB in explaining why this intervention was effective, whereas other demand-side subsidies, such as fare discounts, have proven less successful in this context. To establish the presence of MAB, we employ three distinct methodological approaches, each drawing on different sets of evidence collected during the experiment. They provide compelling evidence of MAB. To our knowledge, this study presents the first empirical investigation of MAB in public transport. The potential to induce MAB through transport vouchers offers valuable insights for the design of policies aimed at increasing public transport ridership.

Suggested Citation

  • Cardona, Santiago Gómez & Guzman, Luis A. & Rincón, Jorge Luis Ochoa, 2026. "Public transport vouchers to enhance ridership: Mental accounting bias in frequent public transport users," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000868
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000868
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.