IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v123y2026ics2214804326000807.html

Faith as a safety net for food insecurity in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Disli, Mustafa
  • Hamza, Sahibzada Muhammad

Abstract

Food insecurity remains a persistent challenge in developing economies, yet cultural and behavioral factors are often underexamined. Using nationally representative Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey data (2019 to 20), this paper examines how religiosity relates to food insecurity. We distinguish institutional religiosity, proxied by madrassa affiliation, from contextual political religiosity, proxied by constituency level religious party vote share. Using quasi experimental estimators including Propensity Score Matching, Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting, and Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Adjustment, we assess multiple food insecurity indicators spanning anxiety, dietary compromise, and material deprivation. Contextual political religiosity is consistently associated with lower food insecurity, while institutional religiosity shows a more selective pattern. The findings suggest that community embedded religious environments, rather than religious schooling alone, are more closely linked to lower food insecurity, with implications for designing culturally embedded delivery channels that complement formal welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Disli, Mustafa & Hamza, Sahibzada Muhammad, 2026. "Faith as a safety net for food insecurity in Pakistan," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000807
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000807
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:123:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.