IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v122y2026ics221480432600056x.html

Risk preference elicitation in finance: Survey vs. experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Fadong
  • Han, Jiatong
  • Bao, Leo

Abstract

Understanding investors’ risk preferences is crucial for financial companies to manage risk and comply with regulatory suitability requirements. While measuring risk preferences through surveys is the standard practice in the field, incentivized experimental methods are widely used in economic labs. Using data from 108 retail investors (62 % female) on a wealth-management FinTech platform, we elicit risk preferences using both a standard survey instrument and an incentivized Holt–Laury task, and relate the resulting survey- and experimental-based measures to actual portfolio choices immediately after onboarding and six months later. We find that the risk preferences elicited via the experiment outperform those via the survey in predicting investors’ portfolios over short and medium periods. These results suggest that the experimental method complements the traditional survey approach and enhances the quality of preference elicitation. Our findings have important implications for selecting preference elicitation methods in the financial industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Fadong & Han, Jiatong & Bao, Leo, 2026. "Risk preference elicitation in finance: Survey vs. experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:122:y:2026:i:c:s221480432600056x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432600056X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102565?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G40 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:122:y:2026:i:c:s221480432600056x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.