IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v121y2026ics2214804326000133.html

Can paying employees to quit boost motivation? Evidence from a lab experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Focacci, Chiara Natalie
  • Gesche, Tobias
  • Kim, Henry
  • Ayres, Ian
  • Stremitzer, Alexander

Abstract

We investigate whether pay-to-quit incentives can enhance worker productivity by conducting an online laboratory experiment with 1000 participants. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a control condition, which offered no financial inducement to quit, or to a treatment condition in which they received a one-time offer of CHF 5 ($ 6.16) to exit the task. While our design does not allow a clean decomposition of the total treatment effect into separate motivational and selection components our findings indicate that participants who reject the quit offer complete, on average, 33% more tasks than those in the control group. The evidence suggests that the foregone quit payment establishes a salient reference point, thereby inducing increased effort and a higher likelihood of surpassing performance thresholds. This study contributes to both behavioral decision research and the practice of personnel management by elucidating how a seemingly counterintuitive incentive can have dual effects: screening out less-committed employees and motivating those who remain to invest greater effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Focacci, Chiara Natalie & Gesche, Tobias & Kim, Henry & Ayres, Ian & Stremitzer, Alexander, 2026. "Can paying employees to quit boost motivation? Evidence from a lab experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:121:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000133
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2026.102521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804326000133
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2026.102521?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:121:y:2026:i:c:s2214804326000133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.