IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v7y1991i2p137-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconciliation of learning rates between the cumulative average vs incremental learning rate models

Author

Listed:
  • Jensen, Robert E.

Abstract

There are two basic learning curve time and cost models that are somewhat confusing, because the same learning rate (e.g. the 80% learning curve) yields different results. The cumulative average model applies the learning rate to average variable cost, whereas the incremental model applies it to marginal cost. This note stresses that, even though an analyst may prefer to conceptualize learning as an explicit constant in the incremental unit learning model, that same analyst has implicitly assumed a varying learning rate in the cumulative average model. A vice versa situation arises if a constant learning rate is assumed in the cumulative average model. Textbooks that compare both models do not reconcile them in the manner presented in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Jensen, Robert E., 1991. "Reconciliation of learning rates between the cumulative average vs incremental learning rate models," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 137-142.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:7:y:1991:i:2:p:137-142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095652219190043Z
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:7:y:1991:i:2:p:137-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.