IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v6y1990i2p143-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do male and female managers in banking view their work roles and their subordinates?

Author

Listed:
  • Kovalainen, Anne

Abstract

Women are still in a minority in managerial positions in most countries. Reasons that have been put forward for this have included the gendered structures of society, the masculine image of the manager and the different kind of socialization processes to which men and women are subject. However, most earlier studies in management and leadership concerned with women in managerial positions and the possible differences between male and female managers have been carried out in the United States. This raises the question as to whether there would be differences between male and female managers as regards work role descriptions and attitudes towards subordinates in a country with a different cultural background and another business tradition. A research project was therefore designed and carried out in Finland, where, not only is there a different organizational culture, but women's participation in society in general and in the labour market and public life has also been high ever since World War II. Using a sample of 100 male and 100 female Finnish bank managers, this study demonstrates that in spite of the reported differences between male and female managers in managerial and leadership attitudes and self-descriptions, major differences were not evident. However, a slight difference in managerial attitudes towards subordinates was noted.

Suggested Citation

  • Kovalainen, Anne, 1990. "How do male and female managers in banking view their work roles and their subordinates?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 143-159.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:6:y:1990:i:2:p:143-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0956522190900218
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:6:y:1990:i:2:p:143-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.