IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v6y1990i1p63-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are management accounting reports useful?

Author

Listed:
  • Schiller, Stefan

Abstract

This article reports the results of a field study on the usefulness of management accounting reports. Users in three companies with different technologies claim to benefit greatly from such reports. Their motivations for this suggest that accounting reports fill a score-keeping function (Simon et al., Centralization vs Decentralization in Organizing the Controller's Department, New York: The Controllership Foundation, 1954) rather than a decision support function. Factors which strongly influence the users' benefit from management accounting information differ for different technologies. In the Mass-producing Company, the ability of management accounting systems (MAS) to describe activities is associated with the usefulness of the reports, while in the Processing Company aspects attributable to the user are the most significant. In the Wholesaling Company, finally, both user characteristics and organizational structure are associated with the usefulness of MAS reports. Most significant is the ability to control operations and measurability in the particular situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Schiller, Stefan, 1990. "Are management accounting reports useful?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 63-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:6:y:1990:i:1:p:63-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095652219090043G
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:6:y:1990:i:1:p:63-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.