IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v5y1989i1p5-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discourse on the social responsibility of the firm in Finland, 1930-1940 and 1972-1982: Theoretical framework and empirical findings

Author

Listed:
  • Takala, Tuomo

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the concept of the social responsibility of the firm and changes in market ideologies in Finland during the two decades 1930-1940 and 1972-1982. The study covers the following points. Firstly, to examine the fundamental principles of social responsibility and its role as the moral basis of a firm's social responsibility. Secondly, to investigate the attitudes, opinions and standpoints of the business world as presented in Finnish employer journals during the 1930s and 1970s; the method used is text interpretation. On this basis three ideologies of the firm's social responsibility can be constructed: the traditional, the modern and the moral. The point of interest is to see whether any changes connected with the time dimension can be identified in the factual content of the ideologies. In this study a new instrument has been applied to the study of business ideologies, namely a rhetorical analysis (based on the works of Aristotle) of the selected texts. The discourse produced by the business world is seen as a tool for legitimating the conduct of business firms. The aim of the analysis is to reveal different forms of "business ideological talk" to try to find out if there is some kind of rhetorical "clue" in the texts and whether there have been any changes over the years. Finally, some suggestions for further research are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Takala, Tuomo, 1989. "Discourse on the social responsibility of the firm in Finland, 1930-1940 and 1972-1982: Theoretical framework and empirical findings," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 5-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:5:y:1989:i:1:p:5-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0956522189900031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:5:y:1989:i:1:p:5-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.