IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v26y2010i2p166-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soldiers and secretaries: Gendered boundary work in the Swedish Armed Forces

Author

Listed:
  • Persson, Alma

Abstract

Summary What happens when intersecting relations of gender and occupation are challenged by organizational change? In the present article, I explore this question based on a case study in the Swedish Armed Forces; an organization that is currently in a state of substantial transformation. Instead of defending the nation's borders against armed attack, the purpose is now to participate in peacekeeping operations worldwide. When informants construct the "New Armed Forces", they envision changed patterns of both gender and occupation. I show how gender and occupation intersect in informants' use of metaphors and images, analyse constructions of gendered occupational boundaries and problematize their visions for the future. I also add new dimensions to existing research by gendering the theory of boundary work.

Suggested Citation

  • Persson, Alma, 2010. "Soldiers and secretaries: Gendered boundary work in the Swedish Armed Forces," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 166-175, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:26:y:2010:i:2:p:166-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522110000023
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katherine Harrison, 2015. "‘No Thought of Gender’: Bodily Norms in Swedish Rescue Services Incident Reporting," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 211-220, May.
    2. Sidhu, Jasvinder & Carnegie, Garry D. & West, Brian, 2021. "Australia's divided accounting profession: The 1969 merger attempt and its legacy," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:26:y:2010:i:2:p:166-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.