IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v19y2003i1p103-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

German organization and leadership theory--stable trends and flexible adaptation

Author

Listed:
  • Larsen, Bøje

Abstract

The production, diffusion and adoption of management theory comprise an active field of study today. Most studies, however, are based on American material since the Second World War. In this article German organization and leadership literature between the 1920s and the 1950s is compared to the equivalent American literature. The study shows that the long trends and the basic ideational content are similar in the two countries. Minor differences include a different balance between what this study calls the organic and the mechanistic paradigms and an authoritative and a speculative bent in the German material. The possible reasons for similarities and differences between the American and German material are discussed. The study of the German material also demonstrates great flexibility on the part of the researchers in adapting to changing political conditions with the help of reframing of arguments and editorial labeling. The study can serve to make us wonder how blind we may be to similar combinations of "stability" and "flexibility" in contemporary management theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Larsen, Bøje, 2003. "German organization and leadership theory--stable trends and flexible adaptation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 103-133, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:19:y:2003:i:1:p:103-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522101000343
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lam Nguyen & Tobias Boehmer & Bahaudin Mujtaba, 2012. "Leadership and Stress Orientations of Germans: An Examination Based on Gender, Age, and Government Work Experience," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 401-420, December.
    2. Larsen, Bøje, 2020. "Whatever happened to “The Technology of Foolishness”? Does it have any potential today?," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:19:y:2003:i:1:p:103-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.