IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v16y2000i2p145-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"The organizational change imperative": an empirical examination of how work units in a learning context respond to increasing complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Söderlund, Magnus
  • Stein, Johan

Abstract

This paper examines an empirical case of the way teams in a teaching context change, as they move from a less complex to a more complex task. The paper also examines the extent to which these changes affect performance in three dimensions: learning, organizational commitment and grades allocated to the units by teachers. Basically, it can be contended that only some behavioral changes did occur in the teams as complexity increased. This finding offers partial support for an "organizational inertia argument". However, it can also be contended that cognitive development did take place (in terms of self-reported learning and grades), as complexity increased. However, change in the behavioral dimension was associated with change in the cognitive dimension only in terms of grades.

Suggested Citation

  • Söderlund, Magnus & Stein, Johan, 2000. ""The organizational change imperative": an empirical examination of how work units in a learning context respond to increasing complexity," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 145-165, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:16:y:2000:i:2:p:145-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522199000135
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:16:y:2000:i:2:p:145-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.