IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v13y1997i4p419-438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data

Author

Listed:
  • Orton, James Douglas

Abstract

In a series of hard-fought and lonely empirical battles, organizational process researchers have started to fortify a position in the no-researcher's land between inductive theory generation and deductive theory verification. This new position suggests that Glaser and Strauss's (1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York) influential descriptions of grounded theory are becoming outdated as a representation of what organizational process researchers do. Organizational process research seems to draw researchers from inductive grounded theory to interative grounded theory, in which researchers cycle back and forth between process theory and process data to produce process knowledge. This article describes the research methods of a forthcoming analysis of strategic change processes in loosely coupled systems, as a way to explore some of the characteristics and challenges of iterative grounded theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Orton, James Douglas, 1997. "From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 419-438, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:13:y:1997:i:4:p:419-438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522197000274
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:13:y:1997:i:4:p:419-438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.