IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v13y1997i3p307-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The standardization of organizational forms as a cropping-up process

Author

Listed:
  • Brunsson, Nils

Abstract

This article looks at the way homogeneity and heterogeneity arise in the forms adopted by organizations. It is argued that under modern conditions a traditional diffusion model is not always very useful in helping us to understand such processes. As an alternative a "cropping-up" model of standardization is presented. This model is particularly apt for explaining the following types of situation: when a certain form appears simultaneously in organizations which have no contact with one another or a common transmitter; when knowledge of possible organizational forms is not a scarce resource: when common forms are invented locally in many organizations rather than resulting from the imitation of others; and when the organizations which adopt similar forms do not seem to share any other fundamental common attribute. The model is based on empirical studies of organizational reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunsson, Nils, 1997. "The standardization of organizational forms as a cropping-up process," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 307-320, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:13:y:1997:i:3:p:307-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522197000031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:13:y:1997:i:3:p:307-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.