IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v13y1997i1p19-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Housekeeping? Yes, but which house? Meaning and accounting context -- A case study

Author

Listed:
  • Solli, Rolf
  • Jönsson, Sten

Abstract

This paper attempts to show how a large number of meanings connected with the same administrative unit can be attached to accounting figures at different organizational levels. The analysis starts from a conversation during a management group meeting, where accounting rules for charging internal rents were on the agenda. A concrete case is used to test and give meaning to a proposed rule. The exchange in terms of a current recipe for decentralized cost cutting is then interpreted, and finally it is shown how a sale-lease-back deal gives a third meaning to the proposed rule. Each of these levels of interpretation, which largely correspond to levels of organization, requires different data sets to describe the specific context and its related discourse. Which discursive and non-discursive arguments apply will differ between levels. To be competent and trusted means to be able to distinguish between discourses and to perform to expectations in the intended context. Certain asymmetries in communication between levels should be expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Solli, Rolf & Jönsson, Sten, 1997. "Housekeeping? Yes, but which house? Meaning and accounting context -- A case study," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 19-38, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:13:y:1997:i:1:p:19-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522196000279
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:13:y:1997:i:1:p:19-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.