IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v55y2026i6s0048733326000697.html

AI in science: When and where it makes a difference

Author

Listed:
  • Bianchini, Stefano
  • Di Girolamo, Valentina
  • Ravet, Julien
  • Arranz, David

Abstract

Why do some scientific fields benefit far more from AI than others? To answer this question, we study the diffusion and effects of AI across more than 170 scientific fields between 2005 and 2023, drawing on a dataset of over 80 million scientific publications, and assessing its contribution to knowledge creation using indicators of novelty and impact. We find that, on average, the use of AI is associated with more novel and highly cited research, and that these effects are strengthened with recent technological advances (namely, transformers and large language models). However, these benefits are far from uniform. The contribution of AI, especially in terms of novelty, intensifies with its penetration within a field, that is, the extent to which AI is widely adopted and embedded in research practices, and with the “roughness” of the underlying knowledge space, meaning the degree to which ideas are fragmented and combinatorially complex.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianchini, Stefano & Di Girolamo, Valentina & Ravet, Julien & Arranz, David, 2026. "AI in science: When and where it makes a difference," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(6).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:55:y:2026:i:6:s0048733326000697
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2026.105478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733326000697
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:55:y:2026:i:6:s0048733326000697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.