IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v232y2026ics1364032126000973.html

Comparative techno-economic analysis of liquid-hydrogen refueling stations: Process designs, pump technologies, and cold energy utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Zhen
  • Wang, Wei

Abstract

This study compares process configurations for liquid-hydrogen refueling stations (LHRSs) in China that store LH2 but dispense gaseous hydrogen at 90 MPa. We analyzed three pressurization systems—mechanical compressors, cryogenic pumps, and hybrid configurations—using equipment specifications from Linde, Air Liquie, and Chart Industries collected during 2023-2024. Station capacities ranged from 200 to 2000 kg H2/day, with all economic calculations based on 15-year equipment lifetimes and Chinese market conditions. We built an econometric model incorporating multivariate regression, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations to evaluate energy consumption, capital costs, operating expenses, and refueling efficiency under realistic uncertainty. The model accounts for equipment performance variability, maintenance requirements, and boil-off gas losses often overlooked in earlier studies, with specific attention to China's electricity pricing structures and manufacturing cost advantages. Cryogenic pumps consumed 30% less energy than compressors at commercial scales above 1000 kg/day, mainly because pressurizing liquids requires less work than compressing gases. This efficiency advantage reduced the levelized cost of hydrogen by 18-24% at large stations under Chinese operating conditions. However, pumps contributed roughly 25% of operating costs and 20-25% of capital investment due to specialized maintenance needs and equipment complexity. Hybrid systems showed worse economics than either pure approach because they combined equipment from both technologies without proportional benefits. Cold energy recovery from LH2 vaporization (446 kJ/kg) looked economically marginal even with China's lower electricity costs. Break-even analysis showed profitability only when electricity exceeded ¥0.85-1.25/kWh ($0.12-0.18/kWh) or carbon taxes reached ¥500-780/ton CO2 ($72-112/ton). Our findings help guide infrastructure investment decisions as China accelerates hydrogen deployment under its carbon neutrality targets.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Zhen & Wang, Wei, 2026. "Comparative techno-economic analysis of liquid-hydrogen refueling stations: Process designs, pump technologies, and cold energy utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:232:y:2026:i:c:s1364032126000973
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2026.116798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032126000973
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2026.116798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:232:y:2026:i:c:s1364032126000973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.