Author
Listed:
- Sayed-Ahmed, H.
- Toldy, Á.I.
- Lappalainen, M.
- Himanen, O.
- Bajamundi, C.
- Santasalo-Aarnio, A.
Abstract
The high cost of green hydrogen prevents the introduction of low-carbon hydrogen into the economy. This work aims to improve the profitability of water electrolysis by providing a holistic analysis of PEM electrolysis in steady and dynamic operation modes. In addition, additional streams of revenue are discussed, including the selling of waste heat from electrolysis and participating in electricity reserve markets. First, a data-driven model was developed to simulate the efficiency of PEM electrolysis as a function of loading percentage. Afterwards, the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) was calculated in steady and dynamic operation modes. The sensitivity to capital cost assumptions, electrolyzer degradation rates, the efficiency profile of AC/DC rectifier, and the electricity profile was studied. It was found that dynamic operation affects the LCOH when compared with steady operation under identical electricity price profiles, ranging from decreasing the LCOH by 42 % to increasing the LCOH by 7.6 %. Moreover, each 1 µV/h increase in the electrolyzer degradation rate increases the LCOH by about 1.3–2.2 %. Conversely, utilizing electrolysis waste heat reduces the LCOH by 0.2–0.35 EUR/kg. Finally, the revenue from participating in electricity reserve markets could range from exceeding the total cost of green hydrogen production to not offsetting the increase in capital costs that result from a lower capacity factor. Overall, a holistic optimization of dynamic electrolysis operation is crucial to ensure that the reduction of LCOH from extra streams of revenue and lower electricity prices exceeds the increase in LCOH from a higher degradation rate and lower capacity factor.
Suggested Citation
Sayed-Ahmed, H. & Toldy, Á.I. & Lappalainen, M. & Himanen, O. & Bajamundi, C. & Santasalo-Aarnio, A., 2025.
"Strategies and challenges for reducing green hydrogen cost: Operation mode and revenue streams,"
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:rensus:v:223:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125007385
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116065
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:223:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125007385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.