IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v223y2025ics1364032125007324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

3D printing of recycled materials for sustainable construction: A comprehensive economic and life cycle assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Raza, Muhammad Huzaifa
  • Kravchenko, Ekaterina
  • Besklubova, Svetlana
  • Lazorenko, Georgy
  • Markelov, Maxim
  • Kasprzhitskii, Anton
  • Zhong, Ray Y.

Abstract

The demand for sustainable materials and technologies has risen due to the construction sector's substantial impact on the ecosystem, natural resources and human health. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the sustainability potential of recycled materials for the construction 3D printing (3DP) process. Mortar mixtures are designed using recycled binder materials (fly ash and blast furnace slag) and aggregate materials (waste concrete-based recycled fine aggregate (RFA)) for the 3D printing process. The adequacy of different geopolymer mixtures for the printing process is assessed through the open time, slump and spread diameter. The results showed that geopolymer mixtures containing RFA offered adequate fresh properties and more dimensional stability for the 3D printing process. The compression testing of the RFA-based geopolymers (along with different testing orientations) also yields better strength than the natural fine aggregate (NFA) in 3D printing. Apart from lab-scale experimentation, a case study of 3D printed and casted walls (using NFA and RFA based geopolymer mixtures) has been considered for comprehensive economic and life cycle analysis (LCA). The results showed that the 3D printed wall using RFA offered a lower burden on the ecosystem, natural resources, and human health; moreover, the lowest cost was observed in the case of the 3D printed wall containing RFA. The higher overall environmental and economic impact of casted wall was primarily due to the usage of plywood formwork. Sensitivity analysis showed that reusing formwork up to 10 times can potentially reduce economic and ecological burdens, depending on construction complexity, but still, traditional construction's overall burden remains higher than 3D printing. As 3D printing technology matures and economies of scale are realized, 3D printing is expected to reduce costs and environmental impacts further.

Suggested Citation

  • Raza, Muhammad Huzaifa & Kravchenko, Ekaterina & Besklubova, Svetlana & Lazorenko, Georgy & Markelov, Maxim & Kasprzhitskii, Anton & Zhong, Ray Y., 2025. "3D printing of recycled materials for sustainable construction: A comprehensive economic and life cycle assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:223:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125007324
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.116059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125007324
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:223:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125007324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.