IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v222y2025ics1364032125005180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive academic and industrial survey of blockchain technology for the energy sector using fuzzy Einstein decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Cali, Umit
  • Lee, Annabelle
  • Hayes, Barry
  • Lima, Claudio
  • Sebastian-Cardenas, D. Jonathan
  • Flynn, David
  • Kantar, Emre
  • Rahimi, Farrokh
  • Thu, Kaung Si
  • Pasetti, Marco
  • Dynge, Marthe Fogstad
  • Andoni, Merlinda
  • Deveci, Muhammet
  • Kuzlu, Murat
  • Alanso, Raquel
  • Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
  • Mishra, Sambeet
  • Saha, Shammya Shananda
  • Norbu, Sonam
  • Gourisetti, Srinikhil
  • Halden, Ugur
  • Hosseinezhad, Vahid
  • Robu, Valentin

Abstract

The global energy sector is undergoing a significant transformation driven by decarbonization and digitalization, leading to the emergence of Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) — particularly blockchain — as a promising tool for enhancing transparency, security, and efficiency in modern power systems. This study aims to provide a comprehensive academic and industrial survey of blockchain applications in the energy sector and develop a robust decision-making framework to identify and prioritize the most promising real-world use cases based on multidisciplinary criteria. A three-stage methodology was adopted: (i) a literature and market review encompassing over 300 academic publications and commercial blockchain initiatives in energy, (ii) an in-depth evaluation of the evolution and viability of blockchain initiatives in energy with the help of expert surveys, and (iii) a novel decision-making model using a q-rung orthopair fuzzy Multi-Attributive Border Approximation (q-ROF-MABAC) method under the Einstein operator. The results were compared with existing decision models to validate consistency and robustness. Nine key blockchain use case categories were identified and ranked based on technical, economic, and governance dimensions. The results demonstrated that integrating expert insights into a fuzzy logic framework helps filter out overhyped claims in the literature and prioritize realistic and high-impact applications such as green certificates, grid services, and peer-to-peer energy trading. The model’s rankings remained stable across varying weight configurations, confirming the robustness of the methodology. This study provides an evidence-based decision-support tool for researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers to better understand, evaluate, and adopt blockchain technologies in the energy sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Cali, Umit & Lee, Annabelle & Hayes, Barry & Lima, Claudio & Sebastian-Cardenas, D. Jonathan & Flynn, David & Kantar, Emre & Rahimi, Farrokh & Thu, Kaung Si & Pasetti, Marco & Dynge, Marthe Fogstad & , 2025. "A comprehensive academic and industrial survey of blockchain technology for the energy sector using fuzzy Einstein decision-making," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:222:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125005180
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125005180
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:222:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125005180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.