IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v217y2025ics1364032125004678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating inertia estimation methods in low-inertia power systems: A comprehensive review with analytic hierarchy process-based ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Abouyehia, Mohamed
  • Egea-Àlvarez, Agustí
  • Ahmed, Khaled H.

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of inertia estimation methods, with a particular emphasis on the challenges posed by the integration of renewable energy sources (RESs). It examines a broad spectrum of inertia estimation methods, ranging from traditional swing equation-based methods to cutting-edge advancements such as machine learning and real-time analytics. These estimation methods are systematically categorised and evaluated based on key performance metrics including accuracy, simplicity, computational efficiency, and robustness against noise. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is used to identify the most suitable methods for low-inertia systems with high renewable energy penetration. The evaluation also includes an assessment of the temporal operational modes and the implementation requirements for the estimation methods. This leads to detailed recommendations on the most appropriate application environments for each method, considering factors such as system scale and generation mix. Existing challenges and future directions related to inertia estimation are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Abouyehia, Mohamed & Egea-Àlvarez, Agustí & Ahmed, Khaled H., 2025. "Evaluating inertia estimation methods in low-inertia power systems: A comprehensive review with analytic hierarchy process-based ranking," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004678
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125004678
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.