IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v217y2025ics1364032125004307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolution of circular economy performance assessment: A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Ferrante, M.
  • Vitti, M.
  • Sassanelli, C.

Abstract

Circular economy (CE) paradigm is applied in organisations at different levels (companies, supply chains, and ecosystems) to maximise resource use and minimize waste generation, presenting itself as an alternative to the traditional linear economy. However, a gap persists in the availability of standardised, comprehensive methods for assessing CE performance across diverse sectors and levels. Current methodologies often lack consistency, comparability, and applicability to complex systems, highlighting the need for further improvement, mainly considering the growing interest in adopting CE practices, also in compliance with emerging standards and frameworks (e.g., ISO 59000 and Digital Product Passport (DPP)). To support and theoretically ground the filling of these gaps, a systematic literature review (SLR) exploring the evolution of CE performance assessment methods has been conducted by considering as main drivers of analysis the type of variables analysed in the circular systems, the layer of the triple bottom line of the sustainability addressed, and the stage of the system lifecycle considered. It updates and compares the results obtained with those presented in a previous work analysing literature in the same domain up to 2018. The results showed that Life Cycle Assessment remains the most widely used method for lifecycle environmental impact assessment of circular systems, followed by Multi Criteria Decision Making, particularly in End-of-Life and for sustainability aspects. Alternative methods highlight the need for innovation, with some studies proposing industry-specific indicators or combined approaches. Finally, a comprehensive framework is needed to evaluate both positive and negative impacts; standardised Key Performance Indicators, aligned with ISO 59020:2024 and interoperable with DPP, would enhance consistency; and a unified methodology should be developed for CE assessment across all levels, ensuring resource efficiency and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ferrante, M. & Vitti, M. & Sassanelli, C., 2025. "The evolution of circular economy performance assessment: A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004307
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125004307
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2025.115757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s1364032125004307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.