IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v158y2022ics1364032122000764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rare earth element resource evaluation of coal byproducts: A case study from the Powder River Basin, Wyoming

Author

Listed:
  • Bagdonas, D.A.
  • Enriquez, A.J.
  • Coddington, K.A.
  • Finnoff, D.C.
  • McLaughlin, J.F.
  • Bazilian, M.D.
  • Phillips, E.H.
  • McLing, T.L.

Abstract

Domestic Rare Earth Element sources and production are limited in the United States and currently rely on final processing overseas. Increasing demand and resource security domestically has led to significant investigation into rare earth element domestic resources. Much of this work focuses on unconventional potential ore stocks, including coal and coal byproducts. This investigation focuses on coal byproducts generated as ash from coal burning power stations. Wyoming's Powder River Basin hosts the largest U.S. coal stocks for energy production, providing approximately 40% of all thermal coal mined in the U.S. In this effort, in section I, we have studied coal byproducts for rare earth element concentrations and compare these data to current alternative resource knowledge. We find that coal byproducts in this investigation are consistently high enough in rare earth element concentration (above the current Department of Energy 300 ppm cutoff grade) to warrant consideration as a promising potential resource. Rare earth element behavior within the host coal seams is also considered in an effort to better understand resource prospecting and ore body description. In Section II, we evaluate the economic feasibility of rare earth extraction from Powder River Basin coal byproducts using net present value analysis and the rare earth concentrations data from Section I. We calculate the break-even ash-to-oxide output and input unit costs for four coal stations in the Powder River Basin. All four stations have break-even unit costs that are higher than the mine-to-oxide operating cost reported for a traditional rare earth element mine. This is a promising result, especially given that it is more costly to refine rare earths from mined material than from ash. The results are highly sensitive to rare earth prices: given low long-term prices, none of the four stations can feasibly break even. Section III summarizes federal policy considerations in rare earth element resource development. The history of policy development, most recent focus on rare earth element specific funding legislation, paired with section I and II herein, suggest a robust opportunity for development of Wyoming based coal byproducts as a partial solution to current domestic rare earth element short falls and strategic needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bagdonas, D.A. & Enriquez, A.J. & Coddington, K.A. & Finnoff, D.C. & McLaughlin, J.F. & Bazilian, M.D. & Phillips, E.H. & McLing, T.L., 2022. "Rare earth element resource evaluation of coal byproducts: A case study from the Powder River Basin, Wyoming," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122000764
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122000764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yingchun Wei & Wenbo He & Guohong Qin & Anmin Wang & Daiyong Cao, 2022. "Mineralogy and Geochemistry of the Lower Cretaceous Coals in the Junde Mine, Hegang Coalfield, Northeastern China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122000764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.