Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Ruosi
- Sadhukhan, Jhuma
- Zhang, Duo
- Short, Michael
- McKechnie, Jon
- Liu, Yong-Qiang
- Bywater, Angela
- Murali, Rohit
- Dolat, Meshkat
- Pincam, Tararag
- Zarei, Amin
Abstract
Amidst rising interest in biogas as a sustainable alternative to traditional energy vectors like natural gas, this study focuses on its role in achieving net-zero targets—where carbon emissions are balanced with sequestration. Biogas, derived from carbon-neutral organic waste, significantly reduces greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Life cycle assessments (LCA) are crucial for evaluating the global warming potential (GWP) of biogas, ensuring its effectiveness in offsetting fossil fuel equivalents. Due to renewed interest in anaerobic digestion in offsetting carbon, new robust easily calculable algebraic equations are proposed. Our study introduces two complementary sets of equations, grounded in published literature and Ecoinvent databases. Despite their differing structures in lifecycle activity considerations, both sets yield closely aligned estimations, reinforcing confidence in these models. The GWP is sensitive to the feedstock type, electricity and heat consumption, and fugitive emissions. The statistical distributions show the mean GWP (kg CO2e) of 0.54 per m3 biogas, 0.09 per kWh biomethane and 0.73 per kWh electricity production rates of cradle-to-grave systems. The lowest GWP meets the UK's 50 g CO2e per kWh biomethane target by 2030 for gas grid injection. The GWP in g CO2e per kg AD feedstock is 93-104 (manure), 16-26 (sludge), and 273 (grass silage), etc. Further, the GWP savings from the natural gas displacement and biogenic CO2 in biowaste feedstock can offset its AD systems' GWP giving a net GWP saving of 0.5-0.7 kg CO2e per kWh of electricity generated.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Ruosi & Sadhukhan, Jhuma & Zhang, Duo & Short, Michael & McKechnie, Jon & Liu, Yong-Qiang & Bywater, Angela & Murali, Rohit & Dolat, Meshkat & Pincam, Tararag & Zarei, Amin, 2026.
"Novel life cycle GWP models for biogas systems aligned with net-zero policies,"
Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:renene:v:270:y:2026:i:c:s0960148126007913
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2026.125965
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:270:y:2026:i:c:s0960148126007913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.