IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v260y2026ics0960148125027600.html

Evaluating dynamic stall models for thick wind turbine airfoils

Author

Listed:
  • Doosttalab, Mehdi
  • Ferreira, Carlos Simão
  • Ragni, Daniele
  • Yu, Wei
  • Rautmann, Christof

Abstract

The accuracy of the Beddoes–Leishman and Risø dynamic stall models is evaluated against experiments on thick wind turbine airfoils with a relative thickness of 35% and trailing edge thicknesses of 10% and 2%, both with and without vortex generators. The dynamic lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients simulation results are compared with the measurements, obtained in the TU Delft LTT wind tunnel at a Reynolds number of Re=1×106 and dynamic reduced frequency of 0.064. The study revealed that while the aforementioned models successfully predicted the direction of the dynamic cycles, they inaccurately captured the dynamic stall behavior of thick flatback and non-flatback airfoils in all configurations, particularly in separated flows. There was no significant difference observed in the performance of the two models. The reasons for modeling failure are thoroughly examined from both fundamental and mathematical perspectives, and suggestions for improvements are provided. The findings raise concerns regarding the accuracy and reliability of the dynamic load assessment and aeroelasticity analysis for modern large wind turbines, using current dynamic stall models and underscore the necessity for enhancing the existing models.

Suggested Citation

  • Doosttalab, Mehdi & Ferreira, Carlos Simão & Ragni, Daniele & Yu, Wei & Rautmann, Christof, 2026. "Evaluating dynamic stall models for thick wind turbine airfoils," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:260:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125027600
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.125096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125027600
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.125096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:260:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125027600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.