Author
Listed:
- Yang, Lili
- Shan, Rongli
- Xu, Wenwu
- Cui, Peizhe
- Wang, Shuai
- Wang, Yinglong
- Zhu, Zhaoyou
Abstract
The transition towards sustainable energy systems necessitates the development of innovative pathways for the efficient and low-carbon utilization of biomass resources. This study presents the first comprehensive comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of three biomass gasification-based polygeneration systems co-producing dimethyl ether (DME) and power. The carbon footprints (CF) and environmental profiles of the Gasi-SCLC, Gasi-WGS, and Gasi-ALE configurations were quantified and compared. The results show that the Gasi-SCLC system demonstrates the most favorable performance with a CF of 0.1427 kg CO2-eq/MJ, which is significantly lower than that of the Gasi-WGS system (0.2405 kg CO2-eq/MJ) and the Gasi-ALE system (0.3108 kg CO2-eq/MJ). A key methodological innovation of this study lies in its regionalized integrated analysis. The Gasi-ALE pathway assesses the impact of CF under different regional grid configurations, providing actionable insights for regional policy formulation. Sensitivity analysis identifies electricity consumption and DME yield as the primary factors driving the variability of CF. Furthermore, an assessment across five impact categories, conducted using GaBi software, confirms that the Gasi-ALE system imposes the highest overall environmental burden. This study provides critical data and a scientific foundation for promoting the sustainable use of biomass energy and supporting the development of a low-carbon economy.
Suggested Citation
Yang, Lili & Shan, Rongli & Xu, Wenwu & Cui, Peizhe & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Yinglong & Zhu, Zhaoyou, 2026.
"Comparative life cycle carbon footprint assessment of three DME-power polygeneration systems based on biomass gasification,"
Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:renene:v:259:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125027697
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.125105
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:259:y:2026:i:c:s0960148125027697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.