Author
Listed:
- Khosravani, Ali
- Billings, Blake W.
- Powell, Kody M.
Abstract
As the energy sector strives for decarbonization, long-duration storage solutions are emerging as enablers of high-renewable power systems. This study investigates hybrid energy storage, combining Li-ion batteries, pumped hydro storage, and underground hydrogen storage, as an effective approach to enhance the reliability and economics of high-renewable power systems, supporting deep decarbonization goals. To facilitate techno-economic evaluation, we developed an open-access Python module capable of simulating renewable energy systems across different renewable penetration levels, ensuring flexibility and reproducibility for future research. Results indicate that optimal renewable penetration significantly increases from a baseline of 31 %–39 % with compressed air, 49 % with hydrogen, 53 % with pumped hydro, and 56 % with hybrid storage. Compared to a baseline battery-only scenario, the hybrid approach reduces the required renewable capacity by 61 % and lowers the levelized cost of storage by 81 %. Additionally, relative to standalone storage technologies, hybrid storage reduces capacities needed for electrolyzers by 46.3 %, fuel cells by 79.7 %, batteries by 96.4 %, powerhouses by 39.7 %, underground caverns by 50.6 %, and upper reservoirs by 69 %. The results demonstrate that hybrid energy storage significantly improves both technical feasibility and economic viability, establishing it as a superior long-duration energy storage solution for facilitating renewable energy integration.
Suggested Citation
Khosravani, Ali & Billings, Blake W. & Powell, Kody M., 2026.
"What are the best options for long-duration energy storage? A techno-economic comparison of technologies including hybrid energy storage systems,"
Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(PI).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:renene:v:256:y:2026:i:pi:s0960148125023742
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.124710
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:256:y:2026:i:pi:s0960148125023742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.