IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v249y2025ics0960148125008018.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of sustainable biogas valorization to hydrogen via tri-reforming process in packed bed membrane reactor: An integrated CFD-ML digital twin approach

Author

Listed:
  • Torabi, Tara
  • Bairami, Amir
  • Ghasemzadeh, Kamran
  • Shojaei, Mohammad Javad
  • Iulianelli, Adolfo

Abstract

The integration of H2 production with greenhouse gas mitigation offers a promising pathway for sustainable energy generation. This study focuses on optimizing a Pd-Ag packed bed membrane reactor (PBMR) for biogas tri-reforming to produce H2, employing a digital twin framework that combines computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and machine learning (ML). Indeed, industrially, H2 generation is performed by steam reforming of natural gas, while the adoption of biogas as a renewable source may contribute to mitigate the greenhouse gases emission in the atmosphere. Furthermore, rather than the unique steam reforming reaction commonly adopted to produce H2, biogas tri-reforming integrates dry reforming, steam reforming, and partial oxidation reforming, with the scope of transforming CH4 and CO2 contained in a biogas stream into H2. Therefore, to assess the efficiency of the tri-reforming process approach, it was theoretically compared to biogas steam reforming. CFD simulations were performed to evaluate the performance of PBMRs in comparison to packed bed reactors (PBRs), with experimental model validation conducted to ensure accuracy. Four ML models Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were developed to create predictive models and optimize performance parameters. Key findings revealed that PBMRs consistently outperformed PBRs due to process intensification enabled by the Pd-Ag membrane. Among the ML models, the GPR model demonstrated near-perfect accuracy, while ANN and SVR also showed high predictive capabilities, with R2 values of 0.987 and 0.98, respectively. Bayesian optimization identified the optimal operating conditions for tri-reforming in PBMRs as 773 K, an H2O/CH4 ratio of 2.84, and a WHSV of 0.1 h−1, where the simulations revealed the best performance such as CH4 and CO2 conversion equal to around 97 % in both cases, H2 yield to 81 %, H2 recovery to 58 %, and H2 selectivity equal to 87 %, aligning with similar results obtained by CFD analysis. Moreover, the predictive equations underscored that while temperature was critical for enhancing reaction conversions, H2O/CH4 ratio and WHSV showed a more substantial and nuanced influence on both feed conversion and H2 selectivity. The digital twin approach significantly reduced computational costs, enhanced reactor dynamic insights, and provided a robust tool for optimizing sustainable processes, highlighting how the PBMR may improve by 20–25 % H2 selectivity and achieve a marked reduction in CO2 emissions, aligning with sustainable energy goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Torabi, Tara & Bairami, Amir & Ghasemzadeh, Kamran & Shojaei, Mohammad Javad & Iulianelli, Adolfo, 2025. "Optimization of sustainable biogas valorization to hydrogen via tri-reforming process in packed bed membrane reactor: An integrated CFD-ML digital twin approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125008018
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.123139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125008018
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:249:y:2025:i:c:s0960148125008018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.