IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v91y2006i10p1406-1413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimation procedures and error analysis for inferring the total plutonium (Pu) produced by a graphite-moderated reactor

Author

Listed:
  • Heasler, Patrick G.
  • Burr, Tom
  • Reid, Bruce
  • Gesh, Christopher
  • Bayne, Charles

Abstract

Graphite isotope ratio method (GIRM) is a technique that uses measurements and computer models to estimate total plutonium (Pu) production in a graphite-moderated reactor. First, isotopic ratios of trace elements in extracted graphite samples from the target reactor are measured. Then, computer models of the reactor relate those ratios to Pu production. Because Pu is controlled under non-proliferation agreements, an estimate of total Pu production is often required, and a declaration of total Pu might need to be verified through GIRM. In some cases, reactor information (such as core dimensions, coolant details, and operating history) are so well documented that computer models can predict total Pu production without the need for measurements. However, in most cases, reactor information is imperfectly known, so a measurement and model-based method such as GIRM is essential. Here, we focus on GIRM's estimation procedure and its associated uncertainty. We illustrate a simulation strategy for a specific reactor that estimates GIRM's uncertainty and determines which inputs contribute most to GIRM's uncertainty, including inputs to the computer models. These models include a “local†code that relates isotopic ratios to the local Pu production, and a “global†code that predicts the Pu production shape over the entire reactor. This predicted shape is included with other 3D basis functions to provide a “hybrid basis set†that is used to fit the local Pu production estimates. The fitted shape can then be integrated over the entire reactor to estimate total Pu production. This GIRM evaluation provides a good example of several techniques of uncertainty analysis and introduces new reasons to fit a function using basis functions in the evaluation of the impact of uncertainty in the true 3D shape.

Suggested Citation

  • Heasler, Patrick G. & Burr, Tom & Reid, Bruce & Gesh, Christopher & Bayne, Charles, 2006. "Estimation procedures and error analysis for inferring the total plutonium (Pu) produced by a graphite-moderated reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1406-1413.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:10:p:1406-1413
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832005002504
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:91:y:2006:i:10:p:1406-1413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.