Author
Abstract
Understanding driver injury outcomes in two-vehicle crashes remains challenging because interaction effects and unobserved heterogeneity jointly shape injury risk in complex and scenario-dependent ways. Although recent studies have combined machine learning based SHAP and random parameters logit structure models, most hybrid frameworks rely on a single learning algorithm and interpret interaction effects qualitatively or treat them as fixed effects, limiting their ability to capture heterogeneous interaction mechanisms. To address these limitations, this study develops a stability-oriented hybrid framework that integrates multi-tree SHAP analysis based on XGBoost, CatBoost, Random Forest, and Extra Trees with a random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means, using two-vehicle crash data from Shenzhen, China. Cross-model and cross-fold consistency is emphasized to identify robust main effects and interaction candidates, reducing model-specific bias. Class weighting, AUC-PR-oriented evaluation, and probability threshold optimization are jointly adopted to address severe class imbalance. Results show that rear-end crashes are among the most injury-prone crash types and injury severity is highly context-dependent. The Struck × Rear-end interaction exhibits significant random variation, with its mean effect systematically moderated by learner driver status and new energy vehicles, providing direct evidence that interaction effects and heterogeneity are interwoven. Scenario-based probability simulations further reveal substantial variation in predicted injury risk across driver–vehicle–collision role combinations. By embedding stable interaction effects as heterogeneous components within an econometric framework, this study improves the robustness and interpretability of hybrid crash severity models and provides a quantitative basis for targeted risk assessment and interventions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:274:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026002255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.