Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Jiangshi
- Mao, Xiangning
- Feng, Kaichen
- Zhang, Qi
- Liu, Lei
- Gui, Xiangyou
Abstract
High-risk industries represent complex socio-technical systems in which governance failures often arise from the interaction of technical, organizational, and cultural factors. Traditional reliability approaches rely predominantly on accident records or audits, which provide limited insight into governance and safety culture dimensions. To address this limitation, this study develops a semantic diagnostic framework that interprets corporate social responsibility(CSR) reports as indicators of governance performance. Based on 2786 reports issued by 372 enterprises between 2010 and 2023, topic modeling was applied to identify latent governance modules, which were then tracked across regulatory phases using a lifecycle-based Stable–Transformative–Dissolving–Emerging(STDE) typology. Network-based and multivariate analyses were applied to examine governance maturity, coupling, and structural change patterns. Results indicate a sectoral transition from reactive compliance toward more integrated governance structures. Core functions such as hazard identification and employee training remain stable, while investment-oriented themes decline and new governance emphases emerge. Cross-industry comparison indicates relatively mature governance patterns in mining, transitional trajectories in construction and manufacturing, and greater structural diversity in transportation. Overall, the framework provides a complementary, governance-oriented perspective for longitudinal monitoring and cross-sector comparison of safety-related practices, without relying on direct accident or failure data.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Jiangshi & Mao, Xiangning & Feng, Kaichen & Zhang, Qi & Liu, Lei & Gui, Xiangyou, 2026.
"A system-level semantic reliability framework for diagnosing governance failures in high-risk socio-technical systems,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:274:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026002152
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2026.112399
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:274:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026002152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.