IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v274y2026ics0951832026002000.html

Water transmission resilience analytics informed by hydraulics using connectivity, path diversity, and stability

Author

Listed:
  • Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra
  • Mahmood, Farhat
  • Khourchid, Ammar M.
  • Ayyub, Bilal M.
  • Al-Ghamdi, Sami G.
  • Al-Ansari, Tareq

Abstract

Water distribution networks provide a critical role in ensuring a reliable water supply. Assessing the resilience of these networks is essential for managing risks and enhancing water security, particularly in evaluating the reliability of water transmission from reservoirs to tanks. However, existing methodologies often focus on a single aspect, such as connectivity or redundancy, without integrating multiple resilience dimensions. This study addresses this gap by developing a resilience assessment framework that evaluates reservoir-to-tank resilience through three key indicators: hydraulic connectivity, supply path diversity, and supply path stability. The hydraulic connectivity indicator couples graph theory with hydraulic characteristics to evaluate the efficiency of water transport from reservoirs to tanks by incorporating real-time head loss calculations. Supply path diversity quantifies the extent to which the network utilizes multiple transmission routes, and supply path stability assesses the persistence of supply paths over time. These indicators are combined into a composite resilience score to provide a holistic assessment of network performance. A sensitivity analysis is conducted to examine the robustness of the resilience rankings under different methodological assumptions. This methodology was applied to the C-Town benchmark network with seven terminal tanks (Tank 1 to Tank 7) over a 7-day simulation period, and revealed that when considering only hydraulic connectivity, Tank 1 consistently ranked as the most resilient tank, while Tank 4 was the least resilient, reflecting their differences in network connectivity and susceptibility to head loss. When integrating all three indicators into the composite resilience score, Tank 1 remained the most resilient, while Tank 4 continued to rank as one of the least resilient tanks, confirming the stability of the assessment and highlighting the influence of both structural and operational factors on overall resilience. The proposed framework provides a structured approach for evaluating reservoir-to-tank resilience and can support decision-makers in prioritizing network reinforcements and developing targeted mitigation strategies to enhance long-term water security.

Suggested Citation

  • Lahlou, Fatima-Zahra & Mahmood, Farhat & Khourchid, Ammar M. & Ayyub, Bilal M. & Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2026. "Water transmission resilience analytics informed by hydraulics using connectivity, path diversity, and stability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:274:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026002000
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2026.112384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832026002000
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2026.112384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:274:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026002000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.