Author
Listed:
- Zheng, Jin-Ling
- Fang, Sheng-En
Abstract
In structural safety evaluation, machine learning (ML) based methods often exhibit strong data-fitting capabilities but struggle to effectively handle uncertainties in structural response data. Fortunately, Bayesian deep learning (BDL) algorithms can address this drawback by integrating the Bayesian theory with ML algorithms, thereby unifying perception and inference tasks within a single framework. For this purpose, a BDL framework has been proposed combining natural gradient boosting (NGBoost) and the Naïve Bayes theory. The NGBoost serves as the perception component, capturing correlations between deflections at various measurement locations of a healthy structure, while the Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) is employed to enhance interpretability. During the training process, the optimal hyperparameters of the NGBoost is objectively determined through Bayesian optimization (BO). The predicted probability distributions of these deflections are treated as hinge variables. By applying the triple standard deviation principle, a structural safety interval is defined to identify scenarios requiring further evaluation. The task-specific component, based on the Naïve Bayes theory, is then utilized to evaluate the structural condition. A bridge benchmark model was used to verify the safety assessment performance under the limited training samples. In addition, a continuous box-girder bridge was employed to further validate the effectiveness of the proposed structural condition indicator. As the structural degradation increased, the condition indicator accurately reflected the degradation variation.
Suggested Citation
Zheng, Jin-Ling & Fang, Sheng-En, 2026.
"NGBoost-Naïve Bayes collaborative deep learning for structural safety evaluation of bridges,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:271:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026000463
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2026.112230
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:271:y:2026:i:c:s0951832026000463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.