Author
Listed:
- Li, Ningjie
- Hu, Xinli
- Huang, Jinsong
- Beer, Michael
- Zheng, Hongchao
Abstract
Adaptive metamodels using single learning functions fail to consistently maintain the high accuracy or efficiency in calculating failure probabilities of slopes under all scenarios (e.g., natural vs. reservoir slopes) due to the No Free Lunch theorem. It poses a challenge in the adaptive selection of the optimal function under high-dimensional random field domains. To this end, we consider the selection problem as a multi-armed bandit problem, and thus propose a portfolio optimization-based adaptive polynomial-chaos Kriging (POPCK) method that dynamically balances exploration and exploitation of six distinct learning functions, thereby adaptively selecting better functions based on their historical performance. This adaptive selection could be performed under high-dimensional variables by incorporating Karhunen–Loève expansion and sliced inverse regression techniques into POPCK. The feasibility of the proposed method is demonstrated through four classic examples (involving natural, four soil layers, rainfall infiltration, and water level drawdown conditions). Results show that the proposed method exhibits good robustness for all examples, high accuracy (ranking 1st) and computational efficiency (ranking 2nd), whereas the performance of PCKs using the single learning functions fluctuates greatly. This method effectively mitigates the randomness of learning function selection, which is valuable for engineers who lack prior knowledge of optimal learning functions.
Suggested Citation
Li, Ningjie & Hu, Xinli & Huang, Jinsong & Beer, Michael & Zheng, Hongchao, 2026.
"Adaptive portfolio optimization-based metamodel method for the multi-armed bandit problem of learning function in slope reliability analysis,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:271:y:2026:i:c:s0951832025013675
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.112168
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:271:y:2026:i:c:s0951832025013675. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.