Author
Listed:
- Huang, Rong
- Zhao, Xuan
- Yang, Yuzhou
- Liu, Qingshan
- Yuan, Yufei
- Daamen, Winnie
Abstract
Evacuation from transportation tools is receiving increasing attention due to its high risk and complexity. However, as a crucial travel mode, high-deck coaches, have been overlooked, lacking a dedicated evacuation model, let alone exploratory simulation analyses. This work proposes an innovative high-deck coach evacuation model framework, where three intertwined modules are developed to separately delineate the strategic, tactical and operational passenger evacuation behaviours. In the strategic behaviour module, the Cox-Weibull hazard duration model is introduced to capture the pre-evacuation times of passengers so that both the distribution characteristics and the dependence on the proximity to the target exit are encapsulated. In the tactical and operational behaviour modules, elaborate behavioural rules are designed and coupled with Cumulative Prospect Theory to comprehensively incorporate the typical behavioural characteristics and decision-making factors of passengers. The framework is validated with empirical data from various scenarios and proven to significantly outperform the state-of-the-art passenger evacuation model. It is found that the CWM substantially improves the prediction accuracy of the framework compared with the Weibull probabilistic distribution. Overtaking behaviour significantly affects passenger evacuations, but does not induce any benefit for the overall system. This study offers valuable tools and insights for high-deck coach evacuation simulation and management.
Suggested Citation
Huang, Rong & Zhao, Xuan & Yang, Yuzhou & Liu, Qingshan & Yuan, Yufei & Daamen, Winnie, 2026.
"A high-deck coach evacuation model framework: Behavioural modelling, numerical analyses and insights,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007823
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111582
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.