Author
Listed:
- Gao, Yi
- Shao, Haidong
- Yan, Shen
- Wang, Xinyi
- Liu, Bin
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are prominent in multi-sensor fusion for mechanical anomaly detection, but their reliance on the availability of all sensor data may lead to low-quality information in the event of partial sensor failures. Furthermore, these studies mainly rely on fixed thresholds from single operating conditions, limiting adaptability to dynamic scenarios. To address these issues, this paper proposes a new mechanical anomaly detection method called threshold cyclic update graph autoencoder (TCUGAE), driven by partial sensing information. First, a subset of sensor data is selected based on a fused correlation metric, combining linear, nonlinear, and frequency-domain similarities, and the partial sensing information graph (PSG) is constructed to avoid interference from low-quality data. Subsequently, the partial sensing information graph autoencoder (PSGAE) is constructed to optimize a combined loss function, incorporating both reconstruction loss and latent space regularization, for identifying potential anomalies. Finally, a threshold cyclic update (TCU) strategy is developed to dynamically adjust weights and guide the model in adaptively determining anomaly thresholds across multiple operating conditions. The method is applied to analyze a multi-condition imbalanced dataset of multiple mechanical components. Comparative results show the proposed method outperforms existing ones across multiple metrics, demonstrating its robustness and adaptability.
Suggested Citation
Gao, Yi & Shao, Haidong & Yan, Shen & Wang, Xinyi & Liu, Bin, 2026.
"Partial sensing information-driven threshold cyclic update graph autoencoder for mechanical anomaly detection,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007586
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111558
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.