IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipbs0951832025007434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive risk assessment of enclosed space operations on ships

Author

Listed:
  • Gulen, Muhammed Fatih
  • Guedes Soares, C.
  • Arslan, Ozcan

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive risk assessment to identify, quantify, and prioritise enclosed space operations' most critical failure modes. Enclosed space operations on board ships have severe consequences due to the human-related, procedural, equipment-related, operational, emergency response, environmental, and structural hazards involved. It integrates failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis, evidential reasoning, and rule-based Bayesian network techniques to manage uncertainty and model causal relationships. A total of twenty-three failure modes under five main risk components related to enclosed space operations are assessed in detail and the results were analysed both quantitatively and causally. The findings of the analysis revealed that the most critical risk components are procedural and human failures. Furthermore, limited procedural traceability and auditability emerged as the most critical failure mode. In line with the results, the study identifies the risks and the systematic problems behind these risks and provides solution-oriented short- and long-term strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gulen, Muhammed Fatih & Guedes Soares, C. & Arslan, Ozcan, 2026. "A comprehensive risk assessment of enclosed space operations on ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007434
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025007434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.