IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipbs0951832025007197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The hybrid causal logic methodology for risk assessment: Quantification algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Groen, Frank J.
  • Wang, Chengdong
  • Mosleh, Ali
  • Parhizkar, Tarannom

Abstract

The foundation of scenario modeling in traditional probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) methods, dating back to the seminal WASH-100 study, is built on the integration of event trees (ET), or event sequence diagrams (ESD), with fault tree (FT) models. This ET-FT binary logic framework provides a structured approach to analyzing risk scenarios, with causal depth represented by the "basic events" defining each scenario. Introduced in 2005, the hybrid causal logic (HCL) methodology extended the ET-FT model to incorporate Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN), capturing the logical and inferential dependencies within a single, cohesive model. HCL was developed to address limitations in PRA, especially to account for “soft causal factors†where causation cannot be fully or deterministically established, such as human and organizational failures. This methodology has found applications across sectors, including nuclear, aviation, petrochemical, maritime, space, and healthcare. While the HCL solution algorithm, covered by a U.S. patent and integrated into platforms like Trilith and PSIM, has been utilized extensively, its algorithmic details have not been previously disclosed.

Suggested Citation

  • Groen, Frank J. & Wang, Chengdong & Mosleh, Ali & Parhizkar, Tarannom, 2026. "The hybrid causal logic methodology for risk assessment: Quantification algorithm," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007197
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025007197
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025007197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.