Author
Listed:
- Wei, Yian
- Li, Anchi
- Li, Yang
- Cheng, Yao
Abstract
Inspection and maintenance (IM) are crucial for guaranteeing the functionality of engineered systems. In existing studies, an equidistant decision framework is commonly adopted, assuming periodic inspections and immediate maintenance actions (if needed). This assumption limits the search for globally optimal IM decisions. Moreover, the scenario of self-announcing failures and non-negligible IM durations that lead to non-equidistant decision intervals has not been investigated. In this study, we consider the aforementioned factors and propose a novel predictive IM policy that enables decision-makers to conduct non-periodic inspections and perform postponed maintenance actions after an inspection, thereby maximizing the system’s long-run profit rate. First, a belief-based Semi-Markov decision process (SMDP) is formulated to characterize a sequential IM decision-making problem based on the belief about the system state, which is then transformed into an equivalent belief-based MDP. Next, we derive the structural properties of the optimal solution to the transformed MDP, including the existence of the control limits. We further demonstrate that these results remain valid for the hidden failure scenario. Then, we demonstrate that when the minimal decision interval in the proposed sequential IM policy is sufficiently short, the policy is equivalent to a predictive IM policy. For computational efficiency, we develop an improved value iteration algorithm that iteratively reduces the minimum decision interval in the belief-based SMDP until convergence. A case study of an industrial water-filter system demonstrates both the performance superiority of the proposed predictive IM policy and the computational efficiency of the proposed algorithm.
Suggested Citation
Wei, Yian & Li, Anchi & Li, Yang & Cheng, Yao, 2026.
"An optimal predictive inspection and maintenance policy for a multi-state system: A belief-based SMDP approach,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025006970
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111497
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025006970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.