IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipbs0951832025006635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the upper bound of the distribution of bridge traffic loading

Author

Listed:
  • Rizqiansyah, Akbar
  • Caprani, Colin C.

Abstract

Bridges are a vital part of the infrastructure network, facing highly varying traffic loads, which have been the subject of numerous studies. Some of these studies have suggested that traffic loading is a physical process with finite physical limits (e.g. mass). Yet, almost all studies still model probabilistic traffic loading as unbounded, implying the possibility of loads beyond what is physically possible or, worse, infinite load. This work argues that bridge traffic loading probability models should be bounded. A method based on Bayesian statistics incorporating the physical boundedness of traffic and limits based on engineering information is proposed. Diagnostic tools to detect misspecified engineering information are developed. Common causes of supposed observations of unbounded traffic load distributions in the literature are presented. Finally, the proposed methodology is applied to Australian highway traffic. The approach demonstrates a reduction in lifetime load estimation uncertainty and avoidance of physically impossible results, compared to the conventional unbounded bridge traffic load model.

Suggested Citation

  • Rizqiansyah, Akbar & Caprani, Colin C., 2026. "On the upper bound of the distribution of bridge traffic loading," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025006635
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025006635
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pb:s0951832025006635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.