Author
Listed:
- Bahmani, Homa
- Ao, Yibin
- Yang, Dujuan
- Xu, Qiang
- Zhao, Jianjun
Abstract
Primary schools require specific evacuation plans considering children’s developmental vulnerabilities, but current models frequently overlook children’s behavioural and health dynamics. Our proposed reliability-driven agent-based modelling (ABM) framework incorporates the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) for decision-making and Dose-Response Model (DRM) for quantifying health hazards associated with smoke exposure, aiming to close this gap. Using real-world evacuation data from an urban primary school, we simulate risk scenarios to assess interactions between evacuation efficiency, environmental risks, and safety regulations. Results show that smoke density significantly affects system reliability, increasing evacuation time by 43.94% (±0.834) and decreasing evacuee health by 76.83% (±0.735) in the worst-case scenario. We found that more adult guides during evacuations could compensate for students' unpreparedness. However, teacher placement's efficacy and interaction vary greatly depending on smoke patterns. This outcome highlights the need for contingency-based evacuation plans customised to different environmental circumstances and acknowledges the challenges in evaluating the effectiveness of school evacuation strategies. This work contributes to schools’ system safety by offering adaptive solutions for dynamic risks, emphasising the importance of child-specific reliability specifications in school emergency planning. The framework offers practical ideas for urban resilience, enabling organisations to mitigate health hazards and enhance the safety of critical infrastructures in uncertain environments.
Suggested Citation
Bahmani, Homa & Ao, Yibin & Yang, Dujuan & Xu, Qiang & Zhao, Jianjun, 2026.
"Enhancing evacuation safety in urban primary schools: an agent-based model integrating child development behaviour and health dynamics,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007914
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111591
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.