Author
Listed:
- Ren, Qiaoqiao
- Hu, Chengxuan
- Xu, Min
- Song, Jiatong
Abstract
Rear-end crashes represent the most prevalent type of crashes involving autonomous vehicles (AVs), underscoring the critical need to specifically investigate their underlying causes. This study collected 634 AV collision reports from the California Department of Motor Vehicles, spanning from April 1, 2018 to April 12, 2024. An automatic GPU-accelerated variable extraction and enhancement framework was developed to process AV crash records in PDF format. Built environment characteristics, including intersection type, road type, traffic signal, number of lanes, roadside parking, and land use type were supplemented based on extracted geographic coordinates. A total of 2013 human-driven vehicles (HDVs) rear-end crashes that occurred within a 50-foot radius of each AV crash and within the same time window were also collected to conduct the comparative analysis between AV and HDV rear-end crashes. The ordered probit model was employed to identify key individual factors, while the association rule mining was employed to uncover the combinations of contributing factors that frequently co-occur in AV and HDV rear-end crashes. The results confirm the existence of distinct patterns, individual risk factors, and co-occurrence mechanisms that are unique to AV systems under real-world conditions. This study also demonstrates that supplementary built environment factors can significantly influence the occurrence of AV rear-end crashes. Critical factors such as roadside parking, two-way without medians, multiple vehicles, traffic signals, intersections, and land types play pivotal roles in AV rear-end crashes, dominating most rules. These findings can provide valuable insights for reconstructing typical crash scenarios, optimizing road designs, and enhancing AV safety.
Suggested Citation
Ren, Qiaoqiao & Hu, Chengxuan & Xu, Min & Song, Jiatong, 2026.
"Association rule mining of damage severities in autonomous vehicle rear-end crashes with supplementary built environment data,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007896
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111589
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.