IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipas0951832025007811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seismic risk quantification for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment based on the partial binary decision diagram approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yoon, Jae Young
  • Han, Sang Hoon

Abstract

Many efforts have been made to quantitatively evaluate seismic risk in multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) models in light of the fact that the success units cannot be neglected due to the seismic events with large failure probabilities. Previously, a partial binary decision diagram (BDD) approach was shown to generate minimal cut sets (MCSs) with near-exact single-unit risk. To extend this approach to multi-unit risk, this study explores two approaches: one based on fault tree modeling, and one based on the post-processing of MCSs. The first approach reflects the fault trees of success units by converting into BDD logic for risk-significant cut sets of single-unit risk. A multi-unit PSA model with two units was evaluated, and the results showed near-exact risk. However, this approach can produce inaccurate risk based on the cut-off value and MCS information that is difficult to understand for a multi-unit PSA model with many units. The proposed post-processing approach regards the MCSs of success units as different super events according to what shared events are included in each cut set. To implement this approach, a software tool was developed, with the results of a multi-unit site having six units showing near-exact risk along with the MCSs.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoon, Jae Young & Han, Sang Hoon, 2026. "Seismic risk quantification for multi-unit probabilistic safety assessment based on the partial binary decision diagram approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007811
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025007811
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.