IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipas0951832025007173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal mission abort policy for a system subject to dependent deterioration and shock failures

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yanzhe
  • Qi, Faqun
  • Ding, Hongdan
  • Zhou, Hongming

Abstract

This paper presents a joint optimization policy for maintenance and mission abort in a system that experiences internal degradation and external random shock processes. The internal degradation follows a Gamma process, while the random shocks adhere to a Poisson process. A mission abort is initiated when the cumulative number of shocks exceeds a specific threshold or when the degradation level reaches a predetermined threshold. When the degradation level of the system reaches a warning threshold, the mission abort condition owing to shocks decreases. By linking the mission success probability (MSP) and system survivability (SS), the maintenance cost and economic loss are analyzed and applied to determine the optimal abort actions. The optimal mission abort policy is derived by minimizing the long-run average cost of the system. An unmanned aerial vehicle inertial navigation system (UAVS) is applied as a case to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Then, comparative experiments are conducted between the presented strategy and previous abort strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yanzhe & Qi, Faqun & Ding, Hongdan & Zhou, Hongming, 2026. "Optimal mission abort policy for a system subject to dependent deterioration and shock failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007173
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025007173
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025007173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.