Author
Listed:
- Wang, Shipeng
- Wang, Haiyan
- Ma, Xushi
- Han, Yang
- Xue, Guoqing
- Zhang, Leixin
- Li, Yang
Abstract
The automated container port logistics system enhances operational efficiency by integrating information networks with physical equipment and control systems. However, this integration also introduces vulnerabilities that undermine system reliability and resilience. To address the interdependence between the information and physical layers, this study proposes a resilience evaluation model for interdependent port logistics networks. The model incorporates an enhanced load-capacity mechanism and a node buffering strategy, defining five node states and corresponding transition rules to simulate cascading failures from deliberate failures (e.g., cyberattacks) and random failures. A sensitivity analysis evaluates how load tolerance (α), redundancy capacity (β), adjustable parameter (γ), and overload threshold (OT) influence system resilience. Additionally, a sequential node recovery strategy is applied using Graph Convolutional Networks (GCN) and the Asynchronous Advantage Actor-Critic (A3C) algorithm. This strategy is compared with baseline methods based on node degree, betweenness, capacity-link preference, PageRank, and random selection. Simulation results reveal that targeted failures are more destructive, with network collapse occurring when random failures exceed 38%. Parameter variations significantly affect resilience, with functional resilience closely tied to load tolerance and redundancy. Strengthening critical-node redundancy enhances resilience. The proposed GCN-A3C strategy outperforms existing methods in recovery speed and efficiency. This research offers a theoretical foundation for resilience modeling and recovery decision-making in automated port logistics networks.
Suggested Citation
Wang, Shipeng & Wang, Haiyan & Ma, Xushi & Han, Yang & Xue, Guoqing & Zhang, Leixin & Li, Yang, 2026.
"Resilience analysis and recovery strategy for interdependent automated container port networks under cascading failures,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006957
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111495
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.