Author
Abstract
Assessing resilience of the Global Container Shipping Network (GCSN) is crucial for bolstering its preparedness against various disruptions. Despite the growing prominence of regionalization within the GCSN, the precise impact mechanism of this trend on network resilience remains largely unexplored. To address this gap, this study introduces a new methodology for assessing the GCSN resilience from a community-based perspective. Initially, a directed-weighted GCSN is constructed utilizing global container shipping service data, facilitating the fine-grained identification of overlapping community structures through Symmetric Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (SNMF). Subsequently, six innovative community-based resilience metrics are devised, accounting for network directionality and link weight, thereby enabling a reliable assessment of community networks' capacity to maintain both connection efficiency and extent across different community dimensions. Various disruption scenarios, incorporating different disruption dimensions, attacked port characteristics, and disruption types, are designed to thoroughly evaluate community resilience. Experimental results reveal that 10 identified communities maintain strong intra-community connections but are highly vulnerable to disruptions at intra-community hub ports. These disruptions potentially lead to significant resilience degradation and network collapse, especially under targeted cumulative attacks. Consequently, this research contributes new insights into the mechanisms of community-based shipping network resilience and informs strategic decision-making to mitigate various disruption risks.
Suggested Citation
Xin, Xuri & Yang, Zaili, 2026.
"Resilience assessment: Insights from port community structures across the global container shipping network,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006891
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111489
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006891. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.