IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipas0951832025006775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal mission aborting under imperfect shock detection

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Liang
  • Xing, Liudong
  • Levitin, Gregory

Abstract

Existing mission abort policies for systems operating in random environments typically use the number of experienced shocks as a key decision parameter and assume that the shock detection mechanism is perfect. In practice, the shock monitoring system is failure prone, leading to wrong detections including both false negative (real shocks are not detected) and false positive (non-existent shocks are flagged) detections. This work advances the state of the art by modeling mission success probability (MSP) and system survival probability (SSP) of a system subject to imperfect shock detections and mission aborting. A dual-parameter abort policy (AP) is considered, which triggers the mission abort and starts a rescue procedure to survive the system when a predefined number of shock detections take place before a predetermined time. The AP optimization problem is solved to minimize the expected mission losses, balancing MSP and SSP. A case study of an unmanned aerial vehicle performing a surveillance mission in shock environments is provided to demonstrate the proposed model. The influences of shock detection errors and several other model parameters related to shock resistance, shock rate and costs on mission metrics and optimal APs are also investigated, leading to concrete managerial recommendations for controlling failure risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Liang & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2026. "Optimal mission aborting under imperfect shock detection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006775
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025006775
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111477?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.