Author
Listed:
- Yasue, Naruki
- Sato, Go
- Sawaragi, Tetsuo
Abstract
In the safety management of complex socio-technical systems, an approach based on Safety-II has gained attention, focusing on how systems maintain everyday operations in the face of various disturbances and unexpected situations. Performance variability, which refers to the workers’ adjustment activity in response to these external factors, is essential for analyzing system safety and the workers’ knowledge about adaptive behaviors. This study proposes a practical method to identify workers’ performance variability by comparing Work-as-Imagined (WAI) with Work-as-Done (WAD) and systematically extracting workers’ knowledge for managing specific disturbances. This method builds upon the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) and associated semi-quantitative simulation techniques developed within the Safety-II paradigm. The approach involves constructing separate FRAM models for WAI and WAD, followed by comprehensive simulations based on a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) process where functions within the WAD model are iteratively modified. This process identifies the critical functions essential for the operator’s adaptive knowledge, providing a systematic framework to capture and analyze workers’ resilient performances. The practical application of the proposed approach was demonstrated through a case study of the etching work in a compound semiconductor manufacturing process. The results showed that combining the specific functions in the WAD model contributes to operational resilience, reflecting workers’ practical knowledge emerging from interactions between multiple functions. The proposed approach contributes to revising work procedures, improving worker education, and enhancing system safety management.
Suggested Citation
Yasue, Naruki & Sato, Go & Sawaragi, Tetsuo, 2026.
"Extracting knowledge of workers by identifying performance variability using functional resonance analysis method,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006660
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111466
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.