IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v265y2026ipas0951832025006593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing adaptive loading and abort decisions considering state-dependent reward

Author

Listed:
  • Qiu, Qingan
  • Liu, Bosen
  • Sun, Rongchi
  • Pei, Cuicui
  • Zhao, Xian

Abstract

In safety-critical systems, failure mechanisms are fundamentally governed by operational loads, presenting opportunities for risk mitigation via dynamic load management. Additionally, mission aborts serve as an effective measure to enhance system safety during mission operations. This research examines systems executing successive missions with variable workloads, aiming to optimize the balance between mission success probability and system survivability through decisions on abort timing and load levels. We focus on two key decision processes: determining the optimal timing for mission aborts and selecting appropriate load levels prior to mission termination. The goal is to maximize expected revenue, considering mission completion rewards, mission failure costs, and system failure costs, through strategic load and abort policies. Framed within a Markov decision process, we establish sufficient conditions for the value functions to be monotonic and convex. Additionally, we identify conditions that ensure monotonicity in loading policies and facilitate simplified decision rules. Case studies involving temperature control systems in chemical reactors illustrate the practical relevance of our theoretical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiu, Qingan & Liu, Bosen & Sun, Rongchi & Pei, Cuicui & Zhao, Xian, 2026. "Optimizing adaptive loading and abort decisions considering state-dependent reward," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PA).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006593
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2025.111459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025006593
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2025.111459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:265:y:2026:i:pa:s0951832025006593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.